Claude Opus 4 Pricing Calculator

Instantly calculate your Claude Opus 4 costs—just enter input, output, and call volume. Then explore how it compares to Claude Sonnet 4, GPT‑4.1, OpenAI o3, and Gemini 2.5 Pro in performance, pricing, and use case fit.

Trusted by +2K businesses

Claude Opus 4 Cost – Compare LLMs & Budget with Confidence

If you just googled Claude Opus 4 cost, you probably need three things right now:

- Exact, up-to-date official pricing of Claude Opus 4.
- A fast way to plug in your own numbers and watch a dollar figure appear before you ship a single line of code.
- Context—how Opus 4 stacks up against familiar workhorses like GPT-4.1, OpenAI o3, or Gemini 2.5 Pro so you can pick the right tool and the right budget.

LiveChatAI’s free Claude Opus 4 Pricing Calculator does the math in real time and automatically compares rival models.

How to Use the Claude Opus 4 Pricing Calculator

Total time: ≈ 2 minutes
Tool: Claude Opus 4 Pricing Calculator (built right into LiveChatAI)

Step	What to Do	Why It Matters
1. Choose a measurement	• Tokens for precision • Words for long-form text • Characters for UI strings	Not everyone thinks in tokens. Pick the unit that matches your mental model.
2. Enter three values	1) Input size (prompt length) 2) Output size (model’s reply) 3) API calls (how often you’ll hit the endpoint)	These three numbers fully determine your Anthropic bill.
3. Read the breakdown	• Detailed input vs. output cost • Cost per call and grand total • Auto-comparison with GPT‑4.1, OpenAI o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Claude Sonnet 4	See exactly where the money goes and whether Opus 4 is still the smartest buy.

▶️ Opus 4 Cost Scenario:

Imagine you’re building an AI agent for customer support on Shopify. Each session uses:

300 words of system + user context (roughly 400 tokens)
900 words of assistant replies (≈ 1 200 tokens)
20 chatbot turns a day

Calculator Inputs

Field	Value
Measurement	Words
Input size	300
Output size	900
API calls	20

Instant Result

Item	Cost
Total input (6 000 words)	$0.09
Total output (18 000 words)	$1.35
Grand total	$1.44

In other words, forty in-depth customer chats cost less than a latte—and you knew the budget impact before a single merge-request.

Meet Claude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is Anthropic’s new peak-performance LLM. Think of it as a deep-work specialist: it keeps reasoning straight for hours, juggles tool calls in parallel, and remembers what matters across thousands of steps.

Spec	What It Means for You
SWE-bench Verified: 72.5 % (single run) / 79.4 % (parallel compute)	Solves almost 4 in 5 real GitHub issues—best-in-class for production coding agents.
Terminal-bench: 43.2 % / 50.0 %	Handles CLI workflows & scripted automation with real bash tools.
Memory files	Opus 4 can create and update its own “knowledge snippets,” reducing repeated context and shrinking your input bill.
Extended thinking (beta)	Switches into a slow-but-smart mode, running 64k-token reasoning chains, scraping or searching when needed.
Hybrid response modes	Near-instant answers for chat plus deep-focus mode for complex jobs—no model swap required.
Availability	Anthropic API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Vertex AI—and, of course, LiveChatAI’s calculator.
Release date	22 May 2025

Why Opus 4 Changes the Game

✅ Built for AI agents, not just chat
Opus 4 is designed around complex, multi-step tasks—perfect for AI agents that need to think and act, not just answer one-off prompts.

⚡ Faster with parallel tool use
It can handle multiple tools at once—like querying a database, running code, and hitting an API—saving valuable time in real workflows.

🧠 Fewer shortcuts, more reliability
Opus 4 reduces "cheating" behavior (like making up fake edits) by 65% compared to Sonnet 3.7, leading to more trustworthy results.

🎯 Easier to control
It follows system prompts more precisely, avoids drifting off-topic, and reliably outputs structured formats like JSON—essential for automation, especially in support workflows or CRM integrations.

Official Claude Opus 4 Token Pricing (May 2025)

Source: Anthropic launch post

Token Bucket	Price per 1M	What’s Included
Fresh input	$15.00	Any new tokens you send that aren’t cached.
Cached input (−75%)	$3.75	Identical prompts within a one-hour window. Perfect for static system messages.
Output	$75.00	The model’s generated tokens.

* Quick Pricing Notes *
- Tokens ≠ words. One English word ≈ 1.33 tokens; a JSON key might be 2–3.
- No “long context” surcharge. Anthropic bills purely by tokens—you can stuff the full 200 k context window without extra fees.
- Caching is automatic. Same prompt + same user + < 1 hour = 75 % discount. No headers or flags required.

Claude Sonnet 4 vs. Claude Opus 4

Which Claude 4-series model fits your use case best?

Feature	Claude Sonnet 4	Claude Opus 4	What That Means for You
Positioning	Balanced, instant-response flagship	Peak-performance, deep-work flagship	Pick Sonnet 4 for snappy chat UX; choose Opus 4 for long-haul agent tasks
Token pricing (per 1M)	$3 / $15 (input/output)	$15 / $75	Sonnet 4 is 5× cheaper, ideal for high-volume support; Opus 4 reserves budget for critical accuracy
SWE-bench Verified	72.7 % (80.2 % parallel)	72.5 % (79.4 % parallel)	Coding accuracy is virtually tied—your deciding factor is cost vs. memory features
Terminal-bench	35.5 % / 41.3 %	43.2 % / 50.0 %	CLI agents or DevOps bots gain a ~20 % uplift on Opus 4
Agentic tool use (TAU-bench, Retail)	80.5 %	81.4 %	Both handle multi-step workflows; Opus 4 edges ahead on complex chains
Extended thinking	✅ (64k)	✅ (64k)	Equal raw capacity; Opus 4 keeps focus for multi-hour runs
Memory files	❌	✅	Only Opus 4 writes & recalls its own “knowledge snippets” to shrink repeated prompts
Latency profile	Faster default replies (good for live chat)	Slightly higher P95, but hybrid “instant + deep” mode	Sonnet 4 for <2s chats; Opus 4 for research/tool orchestration
Best-fit workloads	24/7 multilingual chat, FAQ bots, real-time support	Full-stack coding agents, data-rich reasoning, autonomous research	Choose based on depth vs. volume

TL;DR — When to Use Each Model

Use Sonnet 4 for fast, budget-friendly conversational AI—great for support chats, sales, or multilingual FAQs. It’s efficient and still nails over 72% of coding tasks.
Choose Opus 4 when you need top-tier accuracy, long memory, or reliable performance on complex tasks—like CI workflows, code migration, or research that spans thousands of steps.

Pro tip: Many teams use both models together—Sonnet 4 handles everyday chats, while Opus 4 steps in for tough tickets or big coding tasks. With LiveChatAI’s calculator, you can compare their costs side-by-side and plan your usage in seconds.

Claude Opus 4 vs. Other Popular LLMs (2025 Snapshot)

Feature	Claude Opus 4	Claude Sonnet 4	OpenAI GPT‑4.1	OpenAI o3	Gemini 2.5 Pro*
Context window	200k	200k	1M	128k	1M (batch)
Input / Output price	$15 / $75	$3 / $15	$2 / $8	$0.6 / $3	$2.5 / $15
SWE-bench	72.5%	72.7%	54.6%	69.1%	63.2%
Terminal-bench	43.2%	35.5%	30.3%	30.2%	25.3%
TAU-bench (Retail)	81.4%	80.5%	70.4%	68.0%	—
Vision input	Images only	Images only	Images	Images + audio	Images
Tool use	✅ Parallel	✅ Parallel	❌	❌	—
Best for	Complex coding, autonomous agents	Fast, balanced chat	Massive-memory reasoning	Budget chat & routing	Google-grounded mega-context

*Gemini 2.5 Pro numbers are “preview” as of 6 May 2025.

✅ When to Choose Claude Opus 4

Use Opus 4 if you need:

Top-tier coding performance
Scoring 70%+ on SWE-bench, it's the best choice for serious development workflows.
Long, reliable autonomy
Ideal for tasks that take hours—like code migration, in-depth research, or batch operations.
Advanced tool coordination
Great for AI agents that need to talk and take actions, like triggering Shopify flows, Zapier automations, or CRM updates in real time. You can
Working memory
Opus 4 can remember and build on past inputs—helpful for agents that need to follow long-term logic or sprint goals.

🚫 When to Skip Opus 4

Consider other models if you need:

Cheapest possible classification
For quick, low-cost tasks like routing or sentiment analysis, go with OpenAI o3 or Claude Haiku.
Audio support
Opus 4 only supports text and images. For voice, use GPT-4o.
Ultra-low latency
If speed under 1 second matters (e.g., in live chat), Sonnet 4 or o3-mini are better options.
Transparent reasoning
Opus 4 doesn’t show its full chain-of-thought unless you’re on Developer Mode. If you need visibility, Claude o1 might be a better fit.

Five Proven Tricks to Keep Your Opus 4 Bill Low

‍Freeze the system prompt
Load your 1,000-token style guide once—after caching, reusing it is nearly free.‍
Use streaming + set max_tokens
Cut responses off when you’ve got what you need—don’t pay for long, unnecessary output.‍
Chunk big documents
Breaking a 180k doc into three 60k chunks is often cheaper—and more efficient—since you can skip irrelevant parts.‍
Pre-filter with o3-mini
Let o3-mini handle basic triage. Only send high-value queries to Opus 4 to save on input costs.‍
Run jobs off-peak
Anthropic loosens rate limits after 01:00 UTC—perfect for batching ETL, reports, or analytics at lower cost.

Key Benefits of the Claude Opus 4 Pricing Calculator

✅ Predictable Budgets
Live, line-item pricing for every prompt, reply, and cached rerun—so your AI chatbot never triggers end-of-month bill shock.
✅ Agent-Grade Precision
Benchmark data baked in (SWE-bench, TAU-bench) ensures your GPT-powered workflows stay production-safe.
✅ Smart Spend Safeguards
Automatic caching math, input/output split, and cheaper-model alerts cut costs before you deploy.
✅ C-Suite-Ready Transparency
Share a permalink or CSV that shows exact cents per task—perfect for stakeholder trust and budget approvals.

Who Benefits Most from Our Claude Opus 4 Pricing Calculator?

Developers & MLOps Engineers – budget coding agents before provisioning GPUs.
E-commerce Growth Teams – forecast AI chatbot for customer support costs per order or per visitor session.
Product Managers – compare Opus 4 against GPT-4.1 or o3 in one click, no spreadsheet wrangling.
Finance & Procurement – audit every API-call assumption with a shareable permalink.
Agencies & Consultancies – quote fixed-fee AI projects with confidence instead of padding for “token creep.”

More Free Calculators from LiveChatAI

More Free Calculators from LiveChatAI

GPT-4.1 Pricing Calculator – Plan million-token memory projects on OpenAI’s flagship.
OpenAI o3 Calculator – Estimate low-latency routing or classification jobs.
Claude Sonnet 4 Calculator – Price mid-range chat & multilingual Q&A.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Calculator – Budget massive-context research runs.
DeepSeek R1 & V3 Calculators – Compare open-weights fine-tuning vs. API cost.

Start Planning Your Claude Opus 4 Costs Today

Ready to predict costs down to the cent—and prove it to your CFO? Try the Claude Opus 4 Pricing Calculator now. Type in your real workload, hit Calculate, and see instant, transparent numbers alongside friendly alternatives. No signup, no credit card, just clarity.

LiveChatAI – powering smarter, cost-aware conversational AI, one token at a time.

All benchmarks and pricing pulled from Anthropic’s “Introducing Claude 4” announcement (22 May 2025) plus publicly available model cards from OpenAI and Google.

Frequently asked questions

1. How accurate is the Claude Opus 4 Pricing Calculator?

All pricing is based on Anthropic’s official May 2025 rates and benchmark data. The calculator applies live math to your exact input/output sizes, includes caching discounts, and compares real-world workloads across multiple models. We update it as soon as providers change pricing.

2. What’s the difference between tokens, words, and characters?

- Tokens are the raw units LLMs count and bill for—roughly 1.33 tokens per English word.
- Words are easier to estimate for content-heavy apps (e.g., blog drafts or support replies).
- Characters are ideal for string-based tasks like UI generation or localization. Choose the format that best matches your workflow—we’ll handle the token math.

3. Is the Opus 4 calculator useful for non-technical teams?

Absolutely. Whether you’re in support, marketing, product, or finance, the calculator simplifies LLM pricing so anyone can forecast costs without touching a line of code. Just enter your use case and get a real, explainable number.

4. Can I simulate multiple models at once—like Claude Opus 4 vs. GPT-4.1?

Yes. Every result includes a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4, Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-4.1, OpenAI o3, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. You’ll instantly see which model gives you the best value for your workload and which trade-offs you’re making (cost, latency, accuracy, etc.).