GPT-5 Pricing Calculator

Instantly estimate GPT-5 API costs. Compare GPT-5, Mini & Nano, model caching savings, and get tips to cut your bill, before you ship a single call.

Trusted by +2K businesses

GPT-5 Cost Calculator Guide - Plan Your API Spend

This page is your step-by-step guide to understanding GPT-5 pricing, planning a realistic budget, and squeezing maximum value from every token.

If you’ve ever been surprised by an AI bill, you’re not alone. GPT-5 is extremely capable, and with great power comes the need for clear cost controls.

Below, I’ll walk you through:

How GPT-5 pricing works (in the most practical way possible)
How to use the calculator (inputs → cost, step by step)
Easy conversion rules (tokens ↔ words ↔ characters)
When to pick GPT-5, GPT-5 mini, or GPT-5 nano
Simple tricks to cut your bill without cutting quality

Quick facts (so you can budget with confidence)

Quick facts on GPT-5 pricing, token rates, limits, and advanced usage tips.

1. Models & prices (per 1M tokens):

GPT-5 — $1.25 input, $10.00 output
GPT-5 mini — $0.25 input, $2.00 output
GPT-5 nano — $0.05 input, $0.40 output.

2. Cached input discount (GPT-5): $0.125 per 1M cached input tokens (≈ 90% off standard input). The calculator accounts for this automatically when you tell it a portion of your prompt repeats across requests.

3. Context & output limits: Up to ~400K total context with 128K max output tokens supported by the GPT-5 family in the API. (The calculator warns you if your numbers would exceed typical limits.)

4. Helpful rules of thumb for sizing text:
~1 token ≈ 4 characters of English text; 100 tokens ≈ 75 words. We use these conversions if you enter words/characters instead of tokens.

5. Extra levers developers can use: GPT-5 adds reasoning_effort (including a minimal option) and a verbosity parameter. Use them to steer the trade-off between speed/conciseness and depth. (More on cost impacts below.)

Why a calculator is essential for GPT-5

GPT-5 was built to take on genuinely hard work, multi-file coding, complex data reasoning, tool-rich agentic workflows, meticulous content plans, and more.

LiveChatAI’s free calculator simplifies complexity into a few easy fields, displays your estimated total in real-time, and breaks down where the money goes, so you can make smart adjustments before shipping.

How GPT-5 pricing works

1) You pay per token in and per token out

Input tokens are everything you send: system instructions, tools schema, conversation history, and your prompt.
Output tokens are everything the model returns: “thinking” + answer + tool call arguments (when applicable).
Each side has its own rate (see above). Output is pricier than input for GPT-5, so long answers cost more than long prompts.

2) Cached input is deeply discounted

If parts of your prompt repeat exactly (and meet the minimum threshold), GPT-5 applies cached input pricing to those repeated segments, $0.125 / 1M tokens for GPT-5.

This is perfect for stable system instructions, style guides, tool specs, or a few-shot exemplars you reuse across calls.

✴️ Good to know: OpenAI’s prompt caching runs automatically on supported models; you don’t have to enable anything special. Keep repeated portions identical to maximize the discount.

3) Context & output limits still apply

GPT-5 family models support very large context (≈ 400K) and big outputs (up to 128K) in the API. Still, every token “in the window” counts toward the cost. Our calculator checks your inputs and flags unrealistic lengths early.

4) Words vs. characters vs. tokens

If you don’t know tokens, don’t worry. The calculator accepts words or characters and converts using OpenAI’s rules of thumb, ~4 characters per token and ~0.75 words per token, to estimate pricing. (For multilingual content the ratio varies; we’ll call that out in the results.)

How to use the GPT-5 Pricing Calculator

Choose your measurement: tokens, words, or characters.

GPT-5 pricing calculator input panel for tokens, words, characters, and API call estimates.

Enter your input size: how large your prompt is (including any reused/system text).
Enter your output size: how long you expect GPT-5 to reply.
Add number of API calls: per job, per user, or across a time period.
Review the breakdown: we’ll show input vs. output subtotals, cached vs. non-cached inputs, and the grand total, with model-by-model comparisons (GPT-5 vs. mini vs. nano).

GPT-5 vs. Other Popular LLM Models (2025 Snapshot)

If you’re wondering whether GPT-5 is worth the investment, it helps to see how it stacks up against the competition.

In 2025, the “big four” in enterprise-grade AI are GPT-5, GPT-4.1/GPT-4o, Claude Opus 4, and Gemini 2.5 Pro, with specialized models like o1 and DeepSeek-R1 gaining traction for niche use cases.

Here’s a quick side-by-side to help you decide where GPT-5 fits in your workflow:

Model	Best For	Context Window*	Reasoning	Multimodal	Notable Strengths	Typical Use Cases
GPT-5	Enterprise agents, complex reasoning, long-context synthesis	Very large (family supports ~400K total)	★★★★★	Text, images; strong tool use	Top coding + agentic performance, low hallucination, great instruction following	End-to-end product agents, multi-file code refactors, research review, high-stakes planning
GPT-5 mini	High-volume apps needing strong quality at lower cost	Large	★★★★☆	Text (plus tools)	Great value, fast, reliable instruction following	Support assistants, short-form generation, UI copy, structured outputs
GPT-5 nano	Ultra-low cost micro-tasks, tight latency	Medium–large	★★★☆☆	Text	Cheap, quick responses, consistent formatting	Classification, extraction, rewrite/normalize, linting
GPT-4.1 / GPT-4o	Fast multimodal chats and coding with solid reasoning	Large	★★★★☆	Full multimodal (4o), strong realtime UX	Speed + versatility; great for interactive experiences	Voice/image chat, prototyping, general coding, tutoring
OpenAI o1 / o3-mini	Deliberate, step-by-step problem solving	Large	★★★★★ (o1), ★★★★☆ (o3-mini)	Text (tool-use)	Deep reasoning chains; methodical solutions	Math proofs, rigorous planning, complex code challenges
Claude (Opus / 3.5 Sonnet)	Long-form writing, careful code edits	Large–very large	★★★☆☆	Primarily text (image support varies)	Clear, cautious prose; strong summarization	Policy drafting, reports, code review commentary
Gemini 2.5 Pro	Global, multilingual projects; cross-media	Very large (batch options)	★★★☆☆	Full multimodal	Language breadth, media fusion	Translation/localization, large doc analysis, media-rich apps
DeepSeek-R1 (reasoning)	Budget-sensitive deep-thinking experiments	Large	★★★★☆	Text	Strong chain-of-thought style reasoning (when allowed)	Academic problems, algorithmic tasks, logic puzzles

*Context windows and capabilities vary by exact model/version and deployment. Always verify current limits in provider docs.

Who the GPT-5 Pricing Calculator is for

Developers & product teams shipping AI features that must stay within unit-economics.
Support & CX leaders planning to create a chatbot or agent budgets as volume scales.
Data & research teams running long-context analysis on large documents.
Marketing & content teams creating structured long-form content at scale.
Consultants & agencies producing estimates for clients before work starts.

Tips to cut GPT-5 costs (without cutting quality)

1) Be ruthless with prompt length

Keep only what the model truly needs: task, constraints, style. Put examples and schemas behind links or in a separate, cached base prompt referenced by ID (or copy-paste them identically to keep caching active). Shorter prompts reduce input tokens; shorter answers reduce output tokens (the pricier side for GPT-5).

2) Exploit cached input wherever possible

Consolidate your system instruction and style guide into a single block you never change.
Keep your tool schemas stable.
Use canonical few-shot exemplars rather than creating fresh ones per request.
Remember: the repeated segment must be identical to qualify, and caching is applied automatically where supported. Our calculator lets you model “% of prompt reused” to visualize the savings.

3) Cap the response

Set max_output_tokens to match the deliverable. If you want bullet points, you probably don’t need 3,000 tokens back. Because GPT-5 output costs $10 / 1M, trimming even a few thousand tokens in aggregate can move the needle.

4) Pick the right GPT-5 size for the job

Start with GPT-5 mini for throughput-heavy, short-form tasks; upgrade to GPT-5 when the job truly needs the extra depth. Use GPT-5 nano for ultra-cheap, latency-sensitive micro-tasks. The calculator shows all three totals so you can choose with your wallet and your quality bar in mind.

5) Tune verbosity & reasoning effort

GPT-5 exposes a verbosity parameter and a reasoning_effort control (including a minimal option). Lower verbosity usually means fewer output tokens; minimal effort may reduce thinking time and sometimes shrink output, but not every task benefits from less reasoning, so measure quality when you dial it down. Our calculator doesn’t charge for “effort” directly; it shows the impact through tokens you expect to generate.

6) Batch and summarize

For conversational use-cases, keep a running summary of the thread and include that instead of the entire history. For batch jobs, group similar prompts where feasible to reuse the same cached base instructions.

7) Prototype with realistic samples

Token counts vary by language and content type. Run a few real requests, note input/output usage, and feed those numbers into the calculator. The estimates will then match production closely.

What makes GPT-5 worth the spend?

If you’re on the fence about GPT-5 vs. a smaller model, it helps to weigh cost alongside capability:

State-of-the-art coding & agentic tasks with stronger tool use and fewer errors, plus controls like verbosity and reasoning_effort to steer behavior.
Big-context comprehension across long documents and multi-file code—so you can ask more ambitious questions in fewer calls.

Our calculator’s comparison view keeps the decision simple: if mini or nano meets your bar, go small; if not, you’ll at least know exactly what GPT-5 costs before you commit.

More Free Calculators & Resources from LiveChatAI

Explore additional resources to find the best AI model for your unique needs:

The bottom line

GPT-5 gives you an unprecedented blend of intelligence, control, and scale—and with a simple calculator, it’s easy to keep that power affordable. Use it to:

Forecast costs before you commit.
Compare models (GPT-5 vs. mini vs. nano).
Model caching savings for reused prompts.
Dial in output length and effort settings.

When you can see how each token affects your budget, you don’t have to guess. You can plan with confidence, choose the right model, and ship great features without the bill anxiety.

Sources and key references

GPT-5 pricing & sizes (GPT-5, mini, nano): OpenAI — Introducing GPT-5 for developers. (openai.com)
GPT-5 context and output token limits (family overview): OpenAI — GPT-5 landing. (openai.com)
Cached input price for GPT-5: OpenAI API models — GPT-5. (platform.openai.com)
Prompt caching behavior: OpenAI API docs — Prompt caching. (platform.openai.com)
Token conversion rules of thumb: OpenAI Help — What are tokens? and OpenAI Tokenizer. (OpenAI Help Center, platform.openai.com)

Frequently asked questions

What exactly does this calculator do?

It converts your input size, output size, and call volume into estimated token counts, applies GPT-5 pricing (including cached input where you specify reuse), and returns a clear cost breakdown for GPT-5, GPT-5 mini, and GPT-5 nano. Rates and limits are based on OpenAI’s public info.

How does the calculator convert words or characters into tokens?

By default we use OpenAI’s rules of thumb: ~1 token ≈ 4 characters and ~100 tokens ≈ 75 words (≈ 1 word ≈ 1.33 tokens). You can switch the unit or paste raw token counts if you have them.

What qualifies as “identical” for caching?

The repeated portion must match exactly—same order, same text. Even small edits can break the cache. Keep long base instructions, tool schemas, and few-shot examples stable to maximize savings. (Caching on supported models is automatic; no extra setup.)

Will lowering verbosity or using reasoning_effort: minimal reduce cost?

Sometimes. Lower verbosity generally trims output tokens; minimal reasoning may shorten responses and speed up answers. But some tasks need deeper chains of thought to get the right result. The best practice is to A/B test quality and measure token usage with each setting.